Maryland Appellate Ruling Confirms Continued Complexity Of Embryo Clashes Above The LawJanelle DoddJuly 27, 2023bright futures families, assisted reproductive technology, assisted reproduction, ART, infertility, fertility, surrogacy, LGBTQ, surrogate, surrogacy arrangement, surrogacy law, surrogacy legislation, reproductive material, gametes, embryo, sperm, egg, gestational surrogacy, traditional surrogacy, intended parents, international parents, international surrogacy, gestational surrogate, Maryland, United States, United States surrogacy, surrogacy in the United States, ASRM, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, fertility clinic, IVF, in vitro fertilization, Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals of Maryland, Supreme Court, Eisenstadt v. Baird, U.S. Supreme Court, United States Supreme Court, Roe, Wade, Roe v. Wade, Dobbs, Dobbs v. Jackson, Women’s Health Organization, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, embryo dispute, divorce, embryo disposition, cryobank, cryopreservation, oral agreement
Colorado Court Of Appeals Rules For Privacy Rights In Embryo Dispute Above The LawJanelle DoddJune 30, 2022assisted reproductive technology, ART, IVF, in vitro fertilization, infertility, cryopreservation, embryo, embryos, embryo donation, Colorado, Colorado Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals, privacy rights, Dobbs, Roe, Casey, Rooks, Rooks case, Olsen, U.S. Supreme Court, United States Supreme Court, SCOTUS, reproductive autonomy, religious beliefs, personhood, Eisenstadt, embryo disposition
